Head-To-Head Contrast: Wuhan General Group (OTCMKTS:WUHN) versus CECO Environmental (NASDAQ:CECO)

Head-To-Head Contrast: Wuhan General Group (OTCMKTS:WUHN) versus CECO Environmental (NASDAQ:CECO)

Wuhan General Group (OTCMKTS:WUHN – Get Rating) and CECO Environmental (NASDAQ:CECO – Get Rating) are both small industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We’ll compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst ratings, institutional ownership, and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of the latest recommendations and price targets for Wuhan General Group and CECO Environmental, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell ​​Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Wuhan General Group 0 0 0 0 N/A CECO Environmental 0 0 2 0 3.00

CECO Environmental has a consensus price target of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 26.90%. Given CECO Environmental’s more likely upside potential, analysts clearly believe that CECO Environmental is cheaper than Wuhan General Group.

evaluation and result

This table compares the sales, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation of Wuhan General Group and CECO Environmental. Gross Sales Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Wuhan General Group N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A CECO Environmental $324.14M $1.46 $1.43M $0.20 68.95

CECO Environmental has higher sales and profits than Wuhan General Group.

Risk & Volatility

Wuhan General Group has a beta of 1.97, suggesting its stock price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500. In comparison, CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.26, suggesting its stock price is 26% is more volatile than the S&P 500.

profitability

This table compares the net margins, return on equity, and return on assets of Wuhan General Group and CECO Environmental.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Investment Wuhan General Group nznzn nz

64.9% of CECO Environmental shares are held by institutional investors. 61.1% of Wuhan General Group shares are held by insiders. In comparison, 5.6% of CECO Environmental shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments, and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

summary

CECO Environmental beats Wuhan General Group on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

About Wuhan General Group

(received rating)

Wuhan General Group (China), Inc., through its subsidiaries, researches, develops and markets a range of cannabidiol (CBD)-based products under the Dr. AnnaRx for pharmacies. It is also focused on researching and developing other indications for new psilocybin therapies that enable patients suffering from mental illness. The Company offers its products for medical applications including cancer, mental disorders, chronic pain and others. Wuhan General Group (China), Inc. is headquartered in Pointe-Claire, Canada.

About CECO Environment

(received rating)

CECO Environmental Corp. engages in providing engineering technologies and solutions. It offers environmental, energy, fluid handling and filtration services. The Company operates through the following segments: Energy Solutions, Industrial Solutions and Fluid Handling Solutions. The Energy Solutions segment improves air quality and meets liquid handling needs with market-engineered and customized solutions for the power generation, oil and gas, and petrochemical industries. The Industrial Solutions segment serves the market for industrial environmental protection measures. The Fluid Handling Solutions segment provides pump and filtration solutions that ensure safe and clean operation in some of the harshest and most toxic environments. The company was founded in 1966 by Phillip DeZwirek and is headquartered in Dallas, TX.

Receive News & Ratings for Wuhan General Group Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Wuhan General Group and related companies with our FREE daily email newsletter available from IMS Magazine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *